|
Model Number 466F220A |
Device Problem
Failure to Align (2522)
|
Patient Problem
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 02/23/2019 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The catalog number is unknown, if received it will be provided.Complaint conclusion: as reported, the patient underwent placement of an optease retrievable vena cava filter.The indication for the filter placement was not reported.At some point after the filter implantation, the patient became aware that the filter had tilted.The product was not returned for analysis and the sterile lot number has not been provided; therefore, no device analysis nor device history record review could be performed.The optease retrievable vena cava filter is indicated for use in the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via percutaneous placement in the inferior vena cava (ivc) for patients in which anticoagulants are contraindicated, anticoagulant therapy for thromboembolic disease has failed, emergency treatment following massive pe where anticipated benefits of conventional therapy are reduced or for chronic, recurrent pe where anticoagulant therapy has failed, or is contraindicated.The purpose of a vena cava filter is to catch thrombus from the lower extremities as it travels along normal blood flow patterns up towards the heart.Without images or procedural films for review, the reported filter tilt could not be confirmed and the exact cause could not be determined.Ivc filter tilt has been associated with the anatomy of the vessel, specifically asymmetry and tortuousness.Additionally, the timing and mechanism of the filter tilt is unknown.Given the limited information available for review, there is nothing to suggest that a malfunction in the design and manufacturing process of the device; therefore, no corrective action will be taken.Should additional information become available, the file will be updated accordingly.
|
|
Event Description
|
As reported by the legal brief, the patient underwent placement of a optease vena cava filter.The filter subsequently malfunctioned and caused injury and damages including, but not limited to: tilt.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional information: section d11 (concomitant medical products: unknown 4 and 6fr sheath).Complaint conclusion: as reported, the patient underwent placement of an optease retrievable vena cava filter.The indication for the filter placement was reported to be trauma after a trampoline accident with resultant cervical spine fractures, paralysis and prolonged bedrest.The patient was noted to be at high risk for deep vein thrombosis (dvt) formation.The filter was implanted via the right femoral vein and placed in an infrarenal position.The patient is reported to have tolerated the procedure well.More than twelve years after the filter implantation, the patient became aware that the filter had tilted.The patient further reported having experienced mental anguish, worry and anxiety associated with the filter.The product was not returned for analysis.A review of the device history record revealed no anomalies during the manufacturing and inspection processes that can be associated with the reported complaint.The optease retrievable vena cava filter is indicated for use in the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via percutaneous placement in the inferior vena cava (ivc) for patients in which anticoagulants are contraindicated, anticoagulant therapy for thromboembolic disease has failed, emergency treatment following massive pe where anticipated benefits of conventional therapy are reduced or for chronic, recurrent pe where anticoagulant therapy has failed, or is contraindicated.The purpose of a vena cava filter is to catch thrombus from the lower extremities as it travels along normal blood flow patterns up towards the heart.Without images or procedural films for review, the reported filter tilt could not be confirmed and the exact cause could not be determined.Ivc filter tilt has been associated with the anatomy of the vessel, specifically asymmetry and tortuousness.Additionally, the timing and mechanism of the filter tilt is unknown.The anxiety experienced by the patient does not represent a device malfunction.Anxiety, part of the body¿s natural response to stress and can cause feelings of, but not limited to, nervousness, mental anguish, fear, unease and worry.Given the limited information available for review, there is nothing to suggest that a malfunction in the design and manufacturing process of the device; therefore, no corrective action will be taken.Should additional information become available, the file will be updated accordingly.
|
|
Event Description
|
As reported by the legal brief, the patient underwent placement of a optease vena cava filter.The filter subsequently malfunctioned and caused injury and damages including, but not limited to: tilt.The following additional information was received per implant records: the indication for filter placement was trauma, status post trampoline accident with cervical spine fractures resulting in paralysis, and prolonged bedrest.The filter was placed via the right groin and deployed below the level of the renal veins and above the iliac bifurcation.Venographic findings noted a widely patent ivc and patent right iliac vein with no evidence of thrombus.The patient tolerated the procedure well.The following additional information was received per patient profile form (ppf): the patient became aware of the reported events approximately 12 years and 9 months post implantation.The patient reports filter tilt.The patient also reports suffering from anxiety.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|