|
|
| Model Number |
Z317H |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Separation (1562)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Foreign Body In Patient (2687); Not Applicable (3189); No Code Available (3191)
|
| Date of Event |
02/21/2020
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device batch number pgk745, and no non-conformances were identified.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.What was the name of the procedure? the patient demographic info: gender, weight, bmi at the time of index procedure on what tissue was the suture used? what was the tissue condition, i.E., normal or thin, calcified, fragile, diseased? what tissue was the needle wire retained in for extending procedure? can you clarify was the procedure extended for 1 hour? can you clarify the specific time of the extended anesthesia time? was the needle retrieved during the initial procedure after the x-ray? was an additional surgical procedure performed to remove the needle? was additional dissection required in other organs or tissues other than the target tissue? was there any change in the patient¿s post-operative care due to the extended anesthesia time? what instruments were used to grasp the needle? where was the needle grasped during use? if applicable, will product be returned, return date, tracking information? what is physician¿s opinion as to the etiology of or contributing factors to this event? what is the patient¿s current status?.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the patient underwent an unknown procedure on an unknown date and suture was used.During the procedure, the needle detached from the suture.It was necessary to do an x-ray and to extend the anesthesia for 1 hour to detect the needle and to remove it.Additional information was requested.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Date sent to the fda: 07/31/2020 additional information: d8, d10, e2, h6 corrected information: d3, g1, g2 additional h-3 summary: rep samples from same lot: it was reported performance pull off - suture needle.It was received for analysis an opened box with twenty-nine unopened samples of product.During the visual inspection of thirteen samples, no defects were found on the packages.The samples were opened, and swage and attachment area were noted to be as expected.The sutures were dispensed without problems and examined along of the strand and no defects, or damaged were observed.A functional test was performed using an instron and the pull force were above the minimum requirements.Per the conditions of the samples received, no performance pull off suture needle was found, and the tested samples met the finished goods requirements.Samples from other lot: it was received for analysis two unopened samples of product code z317h, lot mkk106.During the visual inspection of the samples, no defects were found on the packages.The samples were opened, and swage and attachment area were noted to be as expected.The sutures were dispensed without problems and examined along of the strand and no defects, or damaged were observed.A functional test was performed using an instron and the pull force were above the minimum requirements.The manufacturing records were reviewed, and the manufacturing/packaging criteria were met prior to the release of this batch.Per the conditions of the samples received, no performance pull off suture needle was found, and the tested samples met the finished goods requirements.Attempts are being made to clarify the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.-which lot was involved in the reported event - mkk106 or pgk745? -was only lot pgk745 involved and lot mkk106 was not involved but unopened sample was returned from user? -were two devices involved, one from each lot? -was one device involved and it is unknown which lot (pgk745 and mkk106) was involved? this report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon inc, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon inc, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Date sent to the fda: 08/10/2020 additional information was requested, and the following was obtained: -which lot was involved in the reported event - mkk106 or pgk745? no, only pgk745 involved -was only lot pgk745 involved and lot mkk106 was not involved but unopened sample was returned from user? it's possible -were two devices involved, one from each lot? no, only pgk745 involved -was one device involved and it is unknown which lot (pgk745 and mkk106) was involved? no, only pgk745 involved this report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon inc, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon inc, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|