• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK IRELAND LTD DUETTE MULTI-BAND MUCOSECTOMY DEVICE; KNS UNIT, ELECTROSURGICAL, ENDOSCOPIC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK IRELAND LTD DUETTE MULTI-BAND MUCOSECTOMY DEVICE; KNS UNIT, ELECTROSURGICAL, ENDOSCOPIC Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNKNOWN
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888); Blood Loss (2597)
Event Date 11/16/2010
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation is still pending.A follow up mdr will be submitted to include the investigation conclusions.[alvarez herrero - safety and efficacy of multiband mucosectomy in 1060.Pdf].
 
Event Description
Study title: safety and efficacy of multiband mucosectomy in 1060 resections in barrett's esophagus.Http://dx.Doi.Org/10.1055/5-0030-1256095.Origin: (b)(6).Date aware: 04-mar-2020.Customer entity: (b)(6) medical center, (b)(6), or the (b)(6) hospital, (b)(6).Device: duette (dt-x).Complaint details: clinically insignificant bleeding obscuring the endoscopic view and therefore requiring endoscopic hemostasis during the mbm procedure was seen during 49/243 procedures (20% [95 %cl 15% - 25 %]).Hemostasis was achieved by focal coagulation of the bleeding vessel with the tip of the snare (32 procedures), apc (3), electrosurgical hemostatic forceps (1), clip (7), adrenaline (1), or a combination of these therapies (5).These bleedings were not considered to be acute complications but were regarded as events intrinsic to the resection, since the management of the patient did not alter: none of the bleedings resulted in hospital admission, blood transfusion, or repeat endoscopic intervention,and all of these patients were discharged after the normal postprocedural observation period of 2 -4 hours.
 
Event Description
The investigation was concluded on the 20-jul-2020, this supplement report is being submitted as a cancellation report.On review of the completed investigation it was concluded that the 'clinically insignificant bleeding' was a foreseeable complication of the procedure.These bleedings were not considered to be acute complications but were regarded as events intrinsic to the resection and not related to the use of the device.The management of the patient did not alter: none of the bleedings resulted in hospital admission, blood transfusion, or repeat endoscopic intervention and all of these patients were discharged after the normal postprocedural observation period of 2 -4 hours.Hemorrhage is also a potential side effect listed in the ifu.The event does not meet the criteria of an fda ¿serious injury¿ report or ¿malfunction¿ report as per fda guidelines ¿medical device reporting for manufacturers (2016)¿.No reporting malfunction precedence exists for this complaint event for this product family.The date of event has been updated to reflect the date the literature was accepted.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The investigation was concluded on the 20-jul-2020, this supplement report is being submitted as a cancellation report.Device evaluation: the duette devices of unknown lot numbers involved in this complaint was not available for evaluation.With the information provided, a document based investigation was conducted.This file was created from the journal article."alvarez herrero-safety and efficacy of multiband mucosectomy in1060 resections in barrett's esophagus" multiple complaint files were opened as a result of this paper.This file was opened to investigate the clinically insignificant bleeding obscuring the endoscopic view and therefore requiring endoscopic hemostasis during the mbm procedure was seen during 49/243 procedures (20% [95 %cl 15% - 25 %]).Hemostasis was achieved by focal coagulation of the bleeding vessel with the tip of the snare (32 procedures), apc (3), electrosurgical hemostatic forceps (1), clip (7), adrenaline (1), or a combination of these therapies (5).These bleedings were not considered to be acute complications but were regarded as events intrinsic to the resection, since the management of the patient did not alter: none of the bleedings resulted in hospital admission, blood transfusion, or repeat endoscopic intervention and all of these patients were discharged after the normal postprocedural observation period of 2 -4 hours.Lab evaluation ¿ n/a.Image review ¿ n/a.Document review: as the rpn and lot number of the complaint devices are unknown, a review of the relevant manufacturing records cannot be conducted.However, prior to distribution dt-6 devices are subjected to a visual inspection and functional checks to ensure device integrity.These inspections and functional checks are outlined in internal procedures in place at cirl.As the duette devices from unknown lot number, a review of the relevant manufacturing records cannot be conducted.It should be noted that the instructions for use ( ifu0026-10)which informs the user about the potential complications "those associated with emr include, but are not limited to : retrosternal pain, nausea, laryngeal laceration, esophageal perforation, stricture formation, obstruction, haemorrhage." there is no evidence to suggest that the customer did not follow the instructions for use.Root cause review: a definitive root cause could not be determined from the available information.Medical advisory has confirmed that the device functionality did not contribute to the issue.This effects experience were the result of the procedure being performed.Summary: complaint is confirmed based on customer testimony.These bleedings were not considered to be acute complications but were regarded as events intrinsic to the resection, since the management of the patient did not alter: none of the bleedings resulted in hospital admission, blood transfusion, or repeat endoscopic intervention and all of these patients were discharged after the normal postprocedural observation period of 2 -4 hours.Complaints of this nature will continue to be monitored for potential emerging trends.-.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
DUETTE MULTI-BAND MUCOSECTOMY DEVICE
Type of Device
KNS UNIT, ELECTROSURGICAL, ENDOSCOPIC
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK IRELAND LTD
o halloran road
limerick
MDR Report Key9909558
MDR Text Key196902895
Report Number3001845648-2020-00178
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KNS
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K050578
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,literatur
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 07/20/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/01/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNKNOWN
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Distributor Facility Aware Date11/16/2010
Event Location Hospital
Date Manufacturer Received03/04/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-