| Model Number |
03.612.010 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Mechanical Problem (1384)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
| Date of Event |
01/20/2020
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Part number: 03.612.010, lot number: h732698, per jde, manufactured date: 11/27/2018.A manufacturing related potential cause was not suspected, therefore, per franchise complaint product investigation procedure 100673626 no manufacturing record evaluation is required.Visual inspection: the flex arm (p/n: 03.612.010, lot #: h823717) was returned and received at us customer quality (cq).Upon visual inspection, there are light surface scratches along with the handle and the arm of the device as well as slight discoloration, inspecting the individual arm segments of the device, there appears to be no visible damage on the arm or the chord that connects the device other than etching on the device starting to fade.Functional test: the functional test was performed on the returned devices the knob was not able to be tightened and loosened even when the heavy application of force was applied to rotate the knob.A functional test confirmed the complaint condition of the device not functioning.Can the complaint be replicated with the returned devices> yes.Dimensional inspection: no dimensional inspection was performed due to the relevant drawing being source controlled by the supplier.Document/specification review: manuf.Date of the device was not identified due to mre not performed, reflecting the current revision were reviewed.- flex arm assembly.Complaint confirmed? yes, the knob of the device received was jammed.Hence confirming the allegation.Investigation conclusion the complaint condition is confirmed for the flex arm (p/n: 03.612.010, lot #: h823717).There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the complaint condition and hence the root cause cannot be determined.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Device report from canada reports an event as follows: it was reported that on (b)(6) 2020 during a minimally invasive surgery (mis) decompression of the spine while setting up the flex arm it would not hold it's position.Another flex arm was used.The procedure was completed without surgical delay.The patient was not impacted.This report is for one (1) flex arm.This is report 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Visual inspection: the flex arm (p/n: 03.612.010, lot #: h823717) was returned and received at us cq.Upon visual inspection, there are light surface scratches along with the handle and the arm of the device as well as slight discoloration, inspecting the individual arm segments of the device, there appears to be no visible damage on the arm or the chord that connects the device other than etching on the device starting to fade.Functional test: the functional test was performed on the returned devices the knob was not able to be tightened and loosened even when the heavy application of force was applied to rotate the knob.A functional test confirmed the complaint condition of the device not functioning.Can the complaint be replicated with the returned devices: yes.Dimensional inspection: no dimensional inspection was performed due to the relevant drawing being source controlled by the supplier.Document/specification review: manuf.Date of the device was not identified due to mre not performed, reflecting the current revision were reviewed.Complaint confirmed? yes, the knob of the device received was jammed.Hence confirming the allegation.Investigation conclusion the complaint condition is confirmed for the flex arm (p/n: 03.612.010, lot #: h823717).There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the complaint condition and hence the root cause cannot be determined.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.Device history lot part number: 03.612.010, lot number: h823717, per jde, manufactured date: 07/05/2019.A manufacturing-related potential cause was not suspected, therefore, per franchise complaint product investigation procedure (b)(4) no manufacturing record evaluation is required.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|