|
MDT POWERED SURGICAL SOLUTIONS MOTOR LEGEND EHS STYLUS REFURB; DRILLS, BURRS, TREPHINES & ACCESSORIES (SIMPLE, POWERED)
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Model Number |
EM200-R |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Overheating of Device (1437); Loss of Power (1475); Device Displays Incorrect Message (2591)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Chemical Exposure (2570)
|
| Date of Event |
03/05/2020
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusion can be drawn for the em200.Evaluation could not be performed because the motor seized and was noisy.No conclusion can be drawn for the ad03.No evaluation was performed, as the device was not returned.If the device is returned in the future, product analysis may be performed.The device user manual warnings section includes instructions that heavy side loads and/or long operating times may cause the device to overheat.If the device overheats, discontinue use and rest the device by using it intermittently, or wrap the device in a moist sterile towel.Use of an overheated device may cause injury to the patient or operator.The preventive maintenance/service manual for the legend system specifies service intervals for devices based on the hospital usage level.The maximum specified service interval is 24 months.Device has been in use for approximately 43 months with no record of factory service during this period.We will continue to track and trend this complaint type.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a perforator was used together with an ad03 and em200-r during a brain tumor resection procedure.They noticed that the number of rotations only reached about 4000 and an error code 16 was displayed.At that time, overheating also occurred.There was no backup drill that could be used and the procedure was discontinued for 90 minutes.During that time, a non-medtronic drill was borrowed from a different facility to complete the procedure.On follow up, it was reported that the perforator used was a codman and it was discarded.It was also added that the patient had no further issues post-surgery.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|