|
Avanos medical, inc.Received a single report that referenced three different incidences, which were associated with separate units, involving three different events.This is the second of three reports.Refer to 3006646024-2020-00007 for the first event.Refer to 3006646024-2020-00009 for the third event.Additional information received 12-mar-2020 stated: there were at least 2 instances where a bumper separated from the tube.Neither patient had an unusual body habits in the sense that i did not expect the issue was related to abdominal obesity.The initial complaint was referenced as it was reported via fda medwatch / fda user facility report # mw 5093201 received on (b)(6) 2020, and the following information was provided: halyard g tube which was almost 2 yrs old and was supposed to be removable by external traction, broke upon removal attempt, leaving the internal bumper inside the stomach.Urgent ego was required to remove the internal bumper from the stomach.Bumper was felt to too large to be allowed to pass spontaneously significant concern for small bowel obstruction requiring laparotomy.If bumper passed beyond stomach due to peristalsis therefore was significant urgency for endoscopy.Egd revealed separated internal bumper in stomach see above.Unfortunately, this is the most dramatic incident related tog tube at my facility.But i have seen several g tubes of this brand recently that were degraded way beyond what their calendar age would indicate.I have pre-emptively performed endoscopy to remove them instead of going through what i went through with the pt described above.I feel pts are having to undergo unnecessary endoscopic procedures.The median age of these prematurely degraded g tubes is around 4 months.I am aware of mfr recs stating that tubes more than few months old may exhibit this phenomenon; however, i have been working with g tubes for almost 20 yrs and have not see this level of degradation.Materials issues fda safety report id# (b)(4).The tube in question was 360 days old.
|