• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BECTON DICKINSON, S.A. BD PLASTIPAK 50ML CONCENTRIC LUER LOCK SYRINGE; PISTON SYRINGE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BECTON DICKINSON, S.A. BD PLASTIPAK 50ML CONCENTRIC LUER LOCK SYRINGE; PISTON SYRINGE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 300865
Device Problem Fungus in Device Environment (2316)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 03/16/2020
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
A device evaluation is anticipated, but has not yet begun.Upon completion of the investigation, a supplemental report will be filed.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the product smelled moldy with a bd plastipak¿ 50 ml concentric luer lock syringe.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: one of the end-users contacted distributor about their plastipak, smelled bad, moldy, odor.The end user wanted another package with fresh plastipak.The distributor went to where the plastipaks are placed.But they were also smelling bad (moldy, odor).They have 5520 pieces (92 boxes) that they now want to discard.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information d.10 device available for eval yes, returned to manufacturer on: 2020-03-30 h.6.Investigation summary one closed box with sixty samples were provided to our quality team for investigation.The box was visually inspected, no humidity was observed on the cardboard, there were no drops of water identified outside the syringe containers, and no odor was detected.A device history review was performed for reported lot 1912289, no deviations or non-conformances were identified during the manufacturing process that could have contributed to this issue.We have reviewed the sterilization cycle and inspections for this lot and found all results met required specifications.There have been no changes in the manufacturing process or materials used to manufacture this product.Final products in this manufacturing line, for this reference are sampled and they are subjected to visual and functional inspections during the different manufacturing sub-processes according to procedures.Based upon the visual inspection of the samples received and the quality team's investigation, we were unable to determine the root cause for the alleged defect at this time.Complaints received for this defect and device will be monitored by our quality team for future occurrences.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the product smelled moldy with a bd plastipak¿ 50ml concentric luer lock syringe.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: one of the end-users contacted distributor about their plastipak, smelled bad, moldy-odor.The end-user wanted another package with fresh plastipak.The distributor went to where the plastipaks are placed.But they were also smelling bad (moldy-odor).They have 5520 pieces (92 boxes) that they now want to discard.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BD PLASTIPAK 50ML CONCENTRIC LUER LOCK SYRINGE
Type of Device
PISTON SYRINGE
Manufacturer (Section D)
BECTON DICKINSON, S.A.
camino de valdeolivia
s/n
san agustin de guadalix
MDR Report Key9928950
MDR Text Key205685842
Report Number3003152976-2020-00154
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FMF
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
N/A
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type distributor,foreign,other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/20/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/06/2020
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Other
Device Catalogue Number300865
Device Lot Number1912289
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/30/2020
Date Manufacturer Received03/16/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-