• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. G2 FILTER SYSTEM - JUGULAR; VENA CAVA FILTER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. G2 FILTER SYSTEM - JUGULAR; VENA CAVA FILTER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number RF320J
Device Problems Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
Patient Problems Injury (2348); Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms, Conditions Term / Code Not Available (4581)
Event Date 04/09/2018
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturing review:the device history record (dhr) could not be performed as the lot number is unknown.Investigation summary: the device was not returned for evaluation.Medical records were not provided.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the alleged perforation of the ivc as no objective evidence has been provided to confirm any alleged deficiency with the filter.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documents (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, and unit label) showed that the product labeling is adequate.
 
Event Description
It was reported through the litigation process that one of the filter struts perforated the aorta and the patient underwent an open laparotomy surgery to have the filter removed; however the current status of the patient is unknown.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturing review: the device history record review could not be performed as the lot number is unknown.Investigation summary: the device was not returned for evaluation.The medical records included images.The image review was documented in the medical records.Medical records were provided and reviewed.Approximately eleven years post filter deployment, computed tomography revealed positive for caval perforation.Superior extent of the inferior vena cava filter at l3-l4 disc and inferior extent superior l5 vertebral body.A total of 7 prongs have perforated the inferior vena cava and maximum distance prongs perforated 7 mm.Approximately five months later, surveillance imaging for the aneurysm has demonstrated the incidental findings of multiple strut perforations of the inferior vena cava, including one strut that has also penetrated the adjacent infrarenal aorta.Patient was scheduled for filter retrieval.Sharp dissection was used to expose the struts perforating the abdominal aorta which was cut with a wire cutter and manually removed without the need for an infrarenal aortic cross-clamp.Then cross clamped the inferior vena cava on either side of the palpable vena cava filter.Noted ongoing filling of the vena cava which improves with application of a second clamp superior to the filter.The filter was visualized within the lumen of the vena cava but was densely adherent and its tip seemed incorporated in the posterior vena caval wall.Wire cutters were used to remove several additional struts penetrating the posterior wall and right sided wall of the vena cava.Scissors were then used to excise the vena cava filter from within the lumen and it was passed off the field as a specimen the pathology along with the struts of the been removed piecemeal.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for perforation of the inferior vena cava (ivc).Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documents (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, and unit label) showed that the product labeling is adequate.Section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event Description
It was reported through the litigation process that one of the filter struts perforated the aorta and the patient underwent an open laparotomy surgery to have the filter removed; however the current status of the patient is unknown.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
G2 FILTER SYSTEM - JUGULAR
Type of Device
VENA CAVA FILTER
Manufacturer (Section D)
BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
1625 w 3rd st.
tempe AZ 85281
MDR Report Key9932528
MDR Text Key186680828
Report Number2020394-2020-02444
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DTK
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K052578
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer,health professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/26/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberRF320J
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/18/2020
Initial Date FDA Received04/07/2020
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received04/29/2021
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/26/2021
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age57 YR
-
-