MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643 3DMAX LIGHT; SURGICAL MESH

Catalog Number	0117322
Medical Device Problem Codes	Defective Device (2588); Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes	Pain (1994); Injury (2348); Disability (2371)
Type of Reportable Event	Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
At this time no conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient"; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.This emdr represents the bard/davol 3dmax light (device #2).An additional emdr was submitted to represent the bard/davol 3dmax light (device #1).Should additional information be provided a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
Event or Problem Description
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of two unspecified bard/davol 3dmax light meshes on (b)(6) 2011.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against both the devices.Attorney alleges general allegations for ¿past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient." it is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
At this time no conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient"; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive, no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-oct-2009) is considered to be a best estimate.Updated fields: a2, b2 (outcomes attributed to adv ev), b4, b5, b7, d4 (product catalog no., corporate lot no., udi no., expiry date), g3, g6, h2, h4, h6, h10.This supplemental emdr represents the bard/davol 3dmax light (device 3).An additional supplemental emdr was submitted to represent the bard/davol 3dmax light (device 1).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text: not returned.
Event or Problem Description
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of two unspecified bard/davol 3dmax light meshes on (b)(6) 2011 and (b)(6) 2011.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against both the devices.Attorney alleges general allegations for ¿past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient." it is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2011 ¿ patient was diagnosed with bilateral inguinal hernia thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with implant of two 3dmax light meshes (device 1 and 2).Per operative notes, ¿in the right side, a direct and indirect hernia was identified and dissected.A large 3dmax light mesh (device 1) was placed tacked and sutured.In left side, sac was dissected and another large 3dmax light mesh (device 2) was placed and sutured.¿ (b)(6) 2011 - patient was diagnosed with recurrent right inguinal hernia and pain thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with removal of 3dmax light mesh (device 1) and implant of 3dmax light mesh (device 3).Per operative notes, ¿the previously placed mesh (device 1) was seen rolled from its anatomically placed position.The mesh (device 1) was excised and hernia sac had herniated into direct inguinal defect.An extra-large 3dmax light mesh (device 3) was placed over the defect tacked and sutured.¿.

• Brand Name: 3DMAX LIGHT
• Common Device Name: SURGICAL MESH
• Manufacturer (Section D): DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643; 100 crossings blvd.; warwick RI 02886
• Manufacturer (Section G): BARD SHANNON LIMITED 3005636544; san geronimo industrial park; lot #1, road #3, km 79.7; humacao PR 00791
• Manufacturer Contact: andrew topoulos ; 100 crossings blvd.; warwick, RI 02886 ; 4018258495
• MDR Report Key: 9933241
• Report Number: 1213643-2020-03227
• Device Sequence Number: 18999111
• Product Code: FTL
• UDI-Device Identifier: 00801741031076
• UDI-Public: (01)00801741031076(17)111028(10)HUTJ1058
• Combination Product (Y/N): N
• Initial Reporter State: RI
• Initial Reporter Country: US
• PMA/510(K) Number: K091659
• Number of Events Summarized: 1
• Summary Report (Y/N): N
• Device Implanted Year: 2011
• Reporter Type: Manufacturer
• Report Source: Other,Consumer
• Initial Reporter Occupation: Non-Healthcare Professional
• Type of Report: Initial,Followup
• Report Date (Section B): 09/03/2025

1 Device was Involved in the Event

1 Patient was Involved in the Event

• Is this an Adverse Event Report?: Yes
• Is this a Product Problem Report?: No
• Operator of Device: Health Professional
• Device Expiration Date: 10/28/2011
• Device Catalogue Number: 0117322
• Device Lot Number: HUTJ1058
• Was Device Available for Evaluation?: No
• Type of Report(Section G): Thirty-Day
• Initial Date Received by Manufacturer: 04/01/2020
• Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer: 08/14/2025
• Initial Report FDA Received Date: 04/07/2020
• Supplement Report FDA Received Date: 09/03/2025
• Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N): Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
• Date Device Manufactured: 10/15/2009
• Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N): Yes
• Is This a Single-Use Device that was Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N): No
• Usage of Device: Initial
• Patient Sequence Number: 1
• Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event: Disability; Required Intervention
• Patient Sex: Male