| Catalog Number |
0117070 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Defective Device (2588); Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Pain (1994); Injury (2348); Obstruction/Occlusion (2422)
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
At this time no conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient sustained unspecified injury, however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol perfix light plug on (b)(6) 2017.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the perfix light plug.Attorney alleges that the patient sustained unspecified injury due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol perfix light plug on (b)(6) 2017.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the perfix light plug.Attorney alleges that the patient sustained unspecified injury due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2017 ¿ patient was diagnosed with periumbilical ventral hernia thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with implant of perfix light plug.Per operative notes, ¿in the supraumbilical area, the hernia with sac was reduced.The scar tissues were removed and perfix light plug was placed in the peritoneal space, fascia was closed, sutured, stapled all around.¿ attorney alleges obstruction, pain.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
At this time no conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient sustained unspecified injury, however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive; no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-jan-2017) is considered to be a best estimate.Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|