• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AESCULAP AG COLLECT.NO.QAS KNEE IMPLANTS; KNEE ENDOPROSTHETICS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AESCULAP AG COLLECT.NO.QAS KNEE IMPLANTS; KNEE ENDOPROSTHETICS Back to Search Results
Model Number AE-QAS-K521-99
Device Problems Material Fragmentation (1261); Unstable (1667)
Patient Problems Failure of Implant (1924); Pain (1994); Swelling (2091); Weight Changes (2607)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturing site evaluation: investigation on-going.Additional information / investigation results will be provided in a supplemental report.
 
Event Description
It was reported that there was an issue with as enduro femoral component.The patient was initially implanted with enduro components on (b)(6) 2014 for multidirectional instability and knee pain.All components were cemented with antibiotic - loaded cement with a mixture of vancomycin, fortaz, and placement of stimulan pellets with tobramycin and vancomycin.The surgery in 2014 was noted to be extremely difficult because of difficulty encountered in removing the cement mantle from the previous stem, difficulty encountered with a large amount of scar tissue, the debridement process, mobilization of the vessel and nerve, for which justified the use of a 22 modifier throughout.The patient was put on antibiotics (vancomycin) post-operatively and 6 weeks with a peripherally inserted central catheter (picc) line.The pre-operative diagnosis in 2019 was restricted range of motion, thought secondary to heterotopic bone formation in distal femur with continued pain and swelling.On (b)(6) 2019, a revision surgery was performed; during the procedure, evidence of wear and debris from the carbon fiber was found in surrounding tissue.The patient had also experienced sudden, unexplained weight loss prior to the surgery.The implant that was revised was the aesculap enduro femur.New aesculap enduro components were also implanted.The treatment included placement of antibiotic-loaded stimulan pellets with a mixture of tobramycin and vancomycin.Additional information was requested.The adverse event is filed under xc (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Section d: leading material updated (collective material number).There are no devices available for investigation.Investigation - no product at hand, therefore an investigation at the devices is not possible.This case was discussed with several specialists from the product management, development department, and biomechanic specialists.Further information was requested by the responsible surgeon.Several telephone conferences between aesculap specialists and the responsible surgeon were held in which the topic "implant loosening" and "black debris" was discussed.The investigation and further information gathering from the responsible surgeon is ongoing."psc-enduro knee- black discoloration of the tissue around the prosthesis" was created.Pictorial documentation - there are no pictures available.Batch history review - a review of the device quality and manufacturing history records is not possible because the material number as well as the batch number is unknown.Conclusion and root cause - based on the information available it is not possible to determine a definitive root cause for the failure at that time.Rationale - on the basis of the current information and without a product for investigation, a clear conclusion/root cause for the implant problems can not be drawn.The investigation is ongoing.Until there are valid results from a laboratory investigation regarding tissue samples with the mentioned black staining, it is not possible to determine to origin of the discoloration of the soft tissue.At this time it is not possible to verify if the black staining/debris is responsible for the implant loosening.There are many potential sources regarding to implant loosening: modification/ change in the surgical technique.Cement technique.Patient fall.Patient allergy/infection.Corrective action - a product safety case (psc) was created (see above).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Section d: leading material updated.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
COLLECT.NO.QAS KNEE IMPLANTS
Type of Device
KNEE ENDOPROSTHETICS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AESCULAP AG
po box 40
tuttlingen, 78501
GM  78501
MDR Report Key9949029
MDR Text Key187402002
Report Number2916714-2020-00081
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KRO
Combination Product (y/n)N
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Distributor
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 06/17/2020
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberAE-QAS-K521-99
Device Catalogue NumberAE-QAS-K521-99
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Distributor Facility Aware Date06/16/2020
Event Location Hospital
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received04/10/2020
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Not provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received04/15/2020
06/17/2020
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-