|
It was reported a nester platinum embolization microcoil was used in a (b)(6) year old male patient for a gastric venous embolization procedure.The operator reported the microcoil could not be completely pushed out from the microcatheter.The user then withdrew the microwire and microcatheter, however, the end tip of the coil "fell into the portal vein" during removal.The coil was immediately removed using vascular retrieval forceps.A different coil was used to finish the procedure successfully.No other adverse effects were reported for this incident.
|
|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unchanged, unknown or unavailable.Additional information: d11 additional method code: communication/interviews (4111) d10 ¿ product received on: (b)(6) 2020 investigation ¿ evaluation a representative from chongqing jiatong med.Dev.Co informed cook of an incident involving a nester platinum embolization microcoil.On 31mar2020, during a procedure, the coil could not be fully pushed out from the catheter.The user withdrew the wire guide and catheter.During removal, the end tip of the coil fell into the portal vein.Forceps were used to remove the coil.The user used another device to finish the procedure.There were no adverse effects to the patient as a result of this incidence.A review of the complaint history, device history record, instructions for use (ifu), manufacturing instructions, quality control, and specifications of the device, as well as a visual inspection of the returned device, were conducted during the investigation.The complainant returned one coil to cook for investigation.Physical examination of the returned device showed biomatter present.The coil was elongated and the presence of the end of the coil could not be detected.One weld was present.Measurements could not be obtained due to the condition of the coil.The customer provided also an image and videos of the device that failed.The image is of one coil with biomatter present and elongation on one side.The video shows coil(s) are already placed and there is difficulty deploying another coil.The coil could be partly deployed, but not fully deployed into the patient.Additionally, a document based investigation evaluation was performed.Sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.The risks associated with the devices are acceptable when weighed against the benefits.The device is shipped with instruction for use (ifu) which provides the following information to the user related to the reported failure mode: warnings: "if difficulties occur when deploying the embolization coil, withdraw the wire guide, coil and angiographic catheter simultaneously as a unit.¿ instructions for use: "2.Firmly grasp the loading cartridge between thumb and forefinger.Introduce the metal end of the loading cartridge into the base of the catheter hub.Lock loading cartridge onto catheter hub by turning luer lock adapter clockwise.3.Maintaining position of the cartridge, advance the stiff portion of the wire guide into the loading cannula.Push the coil into the first 20 to 30 cm of the angiographic catheter.Remove the wire guide and loading cartridge.4.With the flexible tip of the wire guide, advance the embolization coil to the tip of the catheter.Verify position of the angiographic catheter prior to deployment.5.Deploy the coil by advancing the wire guide past the tip of the catheter." a review of the device history record (dhr) was also conducted as a part of the investigation.The dhr for the complaint lot revealed one related nonconformance and all affected devices were scrapped.A database search revealed no other complaints have been reported for the device lot.As there are adequate inspection activities established, objective evidence that the dhr was fully executed and no additional complaints from the same lot, it was concluded that there is no evidence that nonconforming product exists in house or in field.It is possible that unknown procedural issues led to the failure.The coil could have become stuck on the guidewire, which could have caused it to unravel in the catheter and become stuck.Based on the information provided, the examination of the returned product, and the results of the investigation, it was concluded that the cause was traced to a component failure without a manufacturing or design defect.The appropriate personnel have been notified.Cook will continue to monitor for similar complaints.Per the quality engineering risk assessment no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|