|
|
| Catalog Number |
5954113 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Defective Device (2588); Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Pain (1994); Injury (2348); Disability (2371)
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
At this time no conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient"; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.This emdr represents the bard/davol ventralight st mesh (device # 2).An additional emdr was submitted to represent the bard/davol ventralight st mesh (device # 1).Should additional information be provided a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of two unspecified bard/davol ventralight st on (b)(6) 2018 and (b)(6) 2019.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against both the devices.It is also alleged that the patient sustained injuries on (b)(6) 2019.Attorney alleges general allegations for "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent injuries sustained by the patient." it is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
At this time no conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient"; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive, no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-oct-2018) is considered to be a best estimate.This supplemental emdr represents the bd ventralight st mesh (device 2).An additional supplemental emdr was submitted to represent the bd ventralight st mesh (device 1).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of two unspecified bard/davol ventralight st on (b)(6) 2018 and (b)(6) 2019.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against both the devices.It is also alleged that the patient sustained injuries on (b)(6) 2019.Attorney alleges general allegations for "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent injuries sustained by the patient." it is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2018 ¿ patient was diagnosed with incarcerated incisional hernia thereby underwent robotic assisted laparoscopic repair with implant of ventralight st mesh (device 1).Per operative notes, ¿ in the epigastric area down to just above the umbilicus, multiple incarcerated incisional hernia was noted and reduced.The intra-abdominal adhesions were reduced and defect was closed with sutures.A large and wide ventralight st mesh was placed over the defect secured circumferentially.¿ (b)(6) 2019 - patient was diagnosed with recurrent incisional hernia and seroma thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with removal of old mesh (device 1) and implant of ventralight st mesh (device 2).Per operative notes, ¿ adhesions from the bowel and omentum to abdominal wall was lysed.The sac was dissected and prior old mesh (device 1) was excised completely and small amount of seroma in left edge fascia was drained.The ellipsoid ventralight st mesh (device 2) was placed over the defect sutured and tacked.¿.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|