|
According to the reporter, during laparoscopic lobectomy procedure, while firing, the staples were found to have fallen off from the staple pocket.The procedure was completed with another device.There was no patient injury.
|
|
Evaluation summary: medtronic conducted an investigation based upon all information received.The device was available for evaluation.Visual inspection noted that the reload was partially fired with the interlock engaged, the jaws were open and staple pushers were visible at the cut line.Functional testing noted that the reload was loaded into a representative instrument and was applied to test media.The interlock was overridden, all remaining staples were placed, and test media was cleanly transected.The reload interlock was tested and found to function properly.It was reported that the staples did not form as expected.The reported issue could not be confirmed.The most likely root cause could not be established from the information available.The product analysis detected an additional condition that was not related to the reported issue: the returned device was found to be partially fired and engaged in interlock.The product analysis noted evidence that the device was not used as intended.The manufacturing records for each device are also thoroughly reviewed prior to release to ensure that it meets all medtronic quality specifications.The instructions included with this device provide the following guidance: failure to completely fire the reload will result in an incomplete cut or incomplete staple formation, which may result in poor hemostasis or leakage.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|